Full Posts

Bloglines Subscribe in Bloglines
Newsgator Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Google Add to Google
netvibes Add to Netvibes


ESAblawg is an educational effort by Keith W. Rizzardi. Correspondence with this site does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Photos or links may be copyrighted (but used with permission, or as fair use). ESA blawg is published with a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons License

florida gators... never threatened!

If you ain't a Gator, you should be! Alligators (and endangered crocs) are important indicator species atop their food chains, with sensitivity to pollution and pesticides akin to humans. See ESA blawg. Gator blood could be our pharmaceutical future, too. See ESA musing.


Follow the truth.

"This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson to William Roscoe, December 27, 1820.


Thanks, Kevin.

KEVIN S. PETTITT helped found this blawg. A D.C.-based IT consultant specializing in Lotus Notes & Domino, he also maintains Lotus Guru blog.

« Another reason to keep the ESA: sticky tape? | Main| Atlanta vs. Apalachicola: southeastern water wars »

Sacramento Delta: now what?

Bookmark :  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 

The huge pumps in the Sacramento Delta provide water to thirsty farm fields and thirsty Californians.  But they also affect species.  The litigation over the Delta smelt will soon be legendary, once U.S. District Court Judge Oliver Wanger issues his orders to (re)direct pump operations to comply with the Endangered Species Act.  But that victory for the environmentalists has consequences.  Farms and people will receive less water.  Other salmonid species in the same watershed will suffer as the quanities and timing of water deliveries are altered, disturbing the cues for their migrations.  Huge numbers of shad will continue to be entrained in the pumps.  See California Progress Report (Oct. 31, 2007)  Water contractors will still argue that the striped bass eat the juvenile smelt and salmon.  See article.  And don't forget about the potential contributions of invasive mussels.  See San Francisco Chronicle (Feb. 5, 2006).  See also Press Release (July 17, 2007). In sum, the mess in the Delta is far, far bigger than the fight over the tiny smelt.  

Delta smelt image from U.S. FWS available online from Sacramento office of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.

While some people remain critical of any suggestions to think (again) about building a perimeter canal to allow waters to be sent elsewhere without disturbing the flows in the Sacramento delta, see (Sept. 6, 2007), the facts lead to only one conclusion: the status quo is unacceptable, and the intersection of law, politics, and science has caused a slow-motion train wreck in the region.  Maybe the Delta smelt is an indicator species, see Aquafornia blog, or maybe its a species worthy only of a God Squad exemption.  Maybe a perimeter canal is a brilliant idea whose time has arrived, or maybe it is another boondoggle.  But given the endless litigation, and the obvious environmental problems, something must change in the Sacramento delta.  Under the current system, either Californians can have water deliveries, or they can have a healthy Delta ecosystem.  But right now, it seems, they can't have both.

Aerial photo of the Clifton forebay, upstream of the Harvey O. Banks Pumping Plant and the California aqueduct, from California Department of Water Resources

Noteworthy Resources:
(Full disclosure: the author worked on the Delta smelt litigation in his prior position as a DOJ attorney.)