Full Posts

Bloglines Subscribe in Bloglines
Newsgator Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Google Add to Google
netvibes Add to Netvibes


ESAblawg is an educational effort by Keith W. Rizzardi. Correspondence with this site does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Photos or links may be copyrighted (but used with permission, or as fair use). ESA blawg is published with a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons License

florida gators... never threatened!

If you ain't a Gator, you should be! Alligators (and endangered crocs) are important indicator species atop their food chains, with sensitivity to pollution and pesticides akin to humans. See ESA blawg. Gator blood could be our pharmaceutical future, too. See ESA musing.


Follow the truth.

"This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson to William Roscoe, December 27, 1820.


Thanks, Kevin.

KEVIN S. PETTITT helped found this blawg. A D.C.-based IT consultant specializing in Lotus Notes & Domino, he also maintains Lotus Guru blog.

« Decision to withdraw listing of Oregon Coast coho arbitrarily relied on controversial analysis. | Main| It's only an emergency listing if FWS says it is. »

Industry may intervene to oppose listing when environmentalists challenge decision not to list.

Bookmark :  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 

County of San Miguel v. MacDonald, 244 F.R.D. 36 (D.D.C., Aug 21, 2007)(business associations can have standing to intervene, even when only a remand is at stake).

ESA cases frequently involve interesting science and novel legal issues.  However, as any DOJ (or in the author's case, former DOJ) litigator will attest, they also frequently address traditional matters such as federal jurisdiction.  In County of San Miguel, the District Court considered the standing of a trade association seeking to intervene in an environmentalist challenge to a U.S. Fish & Wildlife decision not to list the Gunnison sage-grouse (best known for its unique mating rituals) as an endangered species.  The National Audubon Society identified the bird as one of the U.S.'s top-ten most endangered species.  

Photo from FWS, courtesy of Gunnison County
Visit more photos of a sage grouse mating ritual by Digital Grin

Concerned with the potential impacts of listing upon their economic interests, and especially the potential increase in regulatory restriction of member's use of their private lands, the Colorado Cattlemen's Association and others sought intervention.  Applying the constitutional tests for intervention, the Court found that (1) members of the associations would indeed have a likelihood of injury and thus a right to sue in their own right, and (2) the associations intervention was fairly traceable to those injuries.  In addition, applying the test for intervention as of right, pursuant to Rule 24(a)(2), F.R.C.P., the Court held that (a) the intervention was timely, (b) by satisfying the test of constitutional standing, the associations had proven legally protected interests to be at stake, (c) any judicial review of the decision not to list the sage grouse, even if it led only to a remand and reconsideration, could impair those legally protected interests by causing the associations and their members to devote further time to the ESA rulemaking procedures, and thus, detracting from their businesses, and (d) the general alignment of the FWS and associations regarding the decision not to list the species did not mean that FWS adequately represented the cattlemen and associations, because FWS represented the general public.  

Accordingly, the Court granted the motion for intervention to the Colorado Cattlemen's Association.