Subscribe!

 Full Posts

Bloglines Subscribe in Bloglines
Newsgator Subscribe in NewsGator Online
MyYahoo
Google Add to Google
netvibes Add to Netvibes

Copyleft

ESAblawg is an educational effort by Keith W. Rizzardi. Correspondence with this site does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Photos or links may be copyrighted (but used with permission, or as fair use). ESA blawg is published with a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons License

florida gators... never threatened!

If you ain't a Gator, you should be! Alligators (and endangered crocs) are important indicator species atop their food chains, with sensitivity to pollution and pesticides akin to humans. See ESA blawg. Gator blood could be our pharmaceutical future, too. See ESA musing.

gatorlogo2.gif

Follow the truth.

"This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson to William Roscoe, December 27, 1820.

uvaswords.jpg

Thanks, Kevin.

KEVIN S. PETTITT helped found this blawg. A D.C.-based IT consultant specializing in Lotus Notes & Domino, he also maintains Lotus Guru blog.

« You can't blame the Feds for a county's (in)actions. | Main| 12-month finding: Jollyville Plateau salamander »

After the BigMac attack: Interior's mea culpa

Category
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 


On occassion, the environmental community earns criticisms for irrational yet persistent government conspiracy theories.  However, in the case of Julie MacDonald, former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks - once a leading Department of Interior official responsible for Endangered Species Act implementation - environmentalists' claims of systematic government wrongdoing proved justified.  

Rumors of Ms. MacDonald's inappropriate intervention in scientific matters, including alleged orders to rewrite scientific conclusions, swirled for years.  For example, one of the most remarkable of Ms. MacDonald's unscientific rewrites was discussed in a December 5, 2004 New York Times article discussing the greater sage grouse.  In a pre-decisional document, career biologists wrote that "Sage grouse depend entirely on sagebrush throughout the winter for both food and cover." Ms. MacDonald, a civil engineer, disagreed, reversed the agency course, and offered her own substantive (and highly technical) explanation:  "I believe that is an overstatement, as they will eat other stuff if it's available."

In 2006, more stories broke in The Washington Post questioning Ms. MacDonald'sactions.  Eventually, a 2007 Inspector General's investigation (available from the Center for Biological Diversity confirmed Ms. MacDonald's misuse of her public position, leading to her resignation. See AP wire story from abcnews.  A second IG report uncovered even more problems.

The true extent and nature of Ms. MacDonald's influence, and her impacts on the actual decision-making process of the agency, may never be known.  Nevertheless, the facts above certainly suggest that Interior will be hard-pressed to defend its decisions whenever Ms. MacDonald's fingerprints are found.  To its credit, the U.S. FWS has admitted its errors, and yesterday, reversed its own decisions in seven cases denying increased protection for species.  See AP Article by H. Josef Herbert (Nov. 27, 2007).

Sadly, more hard questions, more decision-reversals, and more embarrassment for the Department of Interior could lie ahead.

Noteworthy Resources: