Full Posts

Bloglines Subscribe in Bloglines
Newsgator Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Google Add to Google
netvibes Add to Netvibes


ESAblawg is an educational effort by Keith W. Rizzardi. Correspondence with this site does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Photos or links may be copyrighted (but used with permission, or as fair use). ESA blawg is published with a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons License

florida gators... never threatened!

If you ain't a Gator, you should be! Alligators (and endangered crocs) are important indicator species atop their food chains, with sensitivity to pollution and pesticides akin to humans. See ESA blawg. Gator blood could be our pharmaceutical future, too. See ESA musing.


Follow the truth.

"This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson to William Roscoe, December 27, 1820.


Thanks, Kevin.

KEVIN S. PETTITT helped found this blawg. A D.C.-based IT consultant specializing in Lotus Notes & Domino, he also maintains Lotus Guru blog.

« FWS delays designation of critical habitat for marbled murrelet, awaiting completion of Bureau of Land Management plans | Main| Regulation of lands under Clean Water Act did not trigger special Endangered Species Act protections for listed plant »

Lack of 60-day notice sinks salmon case

Bookmark :  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 

McCrary v. Gutierrez, 528 F.Supp.2d 995 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 6, 2007)
SUMMARY: Plaintiff filed a petition with the National Marine Fisheries Service, seeking to revise the designation of a California Central Coast evolutionarily significant unit (ESU) of coho salmon.  NMFS concluded that petition did not present substantial information that the action was warranted.  Plaintiff filed suit, but the Court dismissed the case for a lack of jurisdiction, because Plaintiff failed to file the required 60-day notice prior to bringing suit.
NOTEABLE EXCERPT: “Section 1533 of the ESA specifically notes that the Secretary ‘shall make a finding as to whether the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information.’ § 1533(b)(3)(A). The Ninth Circuit has held--in the context of the ESA--that when the statute mandates that the Secretary ‘shall’ act, such action is not within the Secretary's discretion. See Ass’n of California Water Agencies v. Evans, 386 F.3d 879, 883-884 (9th Cir. 2004). Thus, the subject matter of Plaintiff's sole cause of action falls within the citizen suit provision of the ESA, which allows for a civil cause of action when ‘there is alleged a failure of the Secretary to perform any act or duty under section 1533 of this title which is not discretionary to the Secretary.’ 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g)(1)(C). Since the ESA allows Plaintiff to file a citizen suit, the APA cannot provide jurisdiction for Plaintiff's action.”

Adult coho salmon photo on NMFS webpage from California Dept. of Fish & Game