Subscribe!

 Full Posts

Bloglines Subscribe in Bloglines
Newsgator Subscribe in NewsGator Online
MyYahoo
Google Add to Google
netvibes Add to Netvibes

Copyleft

ESAblawg is an educational effort by Keith W. Rizzardi. Correspondence with this site does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Photos or links may be copyrighted (but used with permission, or as fair use). ESA blawg is published with a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons License

florida gators... never threatened!

If you ain't a Gator, you should be! Alligators (and endangered crocs) are important indicator species atop their food chains, with sensitivity to pollution and pesticides akin to humans. See ESA blawg. Gator blood could be our pharmaceutical future, too. See ESA musing.

gatorlogo2.gif

Follow the truth.

"This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson to William Roscoe, December 27, 1820.

uvaswords.jpg

Thanks, Kevin.

KEVIN S. PETTITT helped found this blawg. A D.C.-based IT consultant specializing in Lotus Notes & Domino, he also maintains Lotus Guru blog.

« Court declines to second-guess NOAA actions related to Puget Sound Chinook | Main| Ninth Circuit opinion (unpublished) tackles analysis of troublesome ESA provisions in cutthroat trout case »

It ain't over 'til it's over, but Federal Judge in Texas says "it's over," calls San Antonio transmission line challenge moot.

Category
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 


Aquifer Guardians v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Civil Action Nos. SA-06-CA-1121-XR, SA-07-CA-0582-XR. 2008 WL 972661 (W.D.Tex. April 8, 2008).

INTRODUCTION (Excerpt from opinion)

This case arises from the issuance of a June 23, 2006 Biological Opinion (BiOp) by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for the San Antonio City Public Service Electric (CPSE) Cagnon-Kendall transmission line. Plaintiffs allege that the FWS violated § 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and § 706(2)(A) of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) by concluding that the transmission line project was not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the Golden-cheeked warbler, an endangered bird indigenous to Texas. Plaintiffs further allege that the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) violated the ESA and APA when it issued a biological assessment of the transmission line on July 19, 2006 that purportedly failed to ensure against jeopardy to the Golden-cheeked warbler.

KEY HOLDING (Excerpt from opinion)

Although Plaintiffs filed suit in December 2006 before the line was complete, they did not file a motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction. The transmission line is now complete, and Plaintiffs do not seek its dismantlement. Thus, Defendants and Amicus argue the relief Plaintiffs seek can neither be granted nor would it provide the relief they purportedly request...  As a result, they assert "the Corps no longer has jurisdiction over the CPSE's activities, and no federal action remains for FWS to review in a new biological opinion."  Accordingly, "a remand of the Biological Opinion to FWS would not provide any effective relief."  [Relying heavily upon binding circuit court precedent, Bayou Liberty Association, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 217 F.3d 393, 396 (5th Cir.2000), the court agreed with the Federal Defendants, and held that the case was moot.]

The court further noted that the suit was ill-timed: "In the future, should these Plaintiffs or any others wish to challenge a project that might affect the Golden-cheeked warbler, they have the ability to bring suit and obtain appropriate relief from the court prior to the substantial completion of the project. "

GoldenCheekedWarblerFWS.jpg
Photo of  Golden Cheeked Warbler from US FWS, Steve Maslowski, available online from USGS

OTHER RESOURCES:
  • Blogs relating to previous announcement of the lawsuit.
  • CPS Energy's  discussion of the transmission line
  • EIS analysis of the project and routes