Subscribe!

 Full Posts

Bloglines Subscribe in Bloglines
Newsgator Subscribe in NewsGator Online
MyYahoo
Google Add to Google
netvibes Add to Netvibes

Copyleft

ESAblawg is an educational effort by Keith W. Rizzardi. Correspondence with this site does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Photos or links may be copyrighted (but used with permission, or as fair use). ESA blawg is published with a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons License

florida gators... never threatened!

If you ain't a Gator, you should be! Alligators (and endangered crocs) are important indicator species atop their food chains, with sensitivity to pollution and pesticides akin to humans. See ESA blawg. Gator blood could be our pharmaceutical future, too. See ESA musing.

gatorlogo2.gif

Follow the truth.

"This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson to William Roscoe, December 27, 1820.

uvaswords.jpg

Thanks, Kevin.

KEVIN S. PETTITT helped found this blawg. A D.C.-based IT consultant specializing in Lotus Notes & Domino, he also maintains Lotus Guru blog.

« White tailed prarie dog under further review for listing by FWS in response to petition | Main| Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992) »

Rhetoric heating up over global warming in cool places; polar bear litigation taking shape

Category
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 


We knew it was coming.  

Even before the U.S. District Court Judge demanded a decision by May 15, wildlife watchers knew that the debate over the fate of the polar bear would lead to years of litigation.  See ESAblawg (March 2, 2008) on polar bears as a policy proxy, and ESAblawg (April 29, 2008) on the U.S. District Court decision.  

The battle lines of that forthcoming Endangered Species Act lawsuit continue to take shape in the news.

PolarBearNOAAinSnow.GIF
Photo of polar bear from NOAA, available online from the Government of Western Australian

To continue the ESA musing...

Environmentalists motivated the U.S. District Court to order the imminent decision.  But even if those environmentalists are satisfied with the result of that court order, the Pacific Legal Foundation accounced its plans to sue the Federal government if the polar bear is listed as an threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act.  See Sacramento Bee article.  Relatedly, the Business and Media Institute is reporting that the "Polar bear scare could maul energy production," declaring the environmental advocates for the listing of the great white predator to be  "global warming alarmists."   In support for their opposition to a polar bear listing, these groups will unquestionably turn to the uncertainty of the science, such as the recent article by Science Daily declaring Federal polar bear research to be critically flawed.  

Meanwhile, the advocates for polar bear listing, such as the National Wildlife Federation, and the World Wildlife Fund, will adopt the precautionary principle.  Rather than taking chances on uncertain science, only to lead to extinctions and catastrophe, these groups will argue that the sound stewardship necessitates protective measures.

Whatever decision FWS makes, the agency -- not to mention the poor DOJ lawyer or two who have to defend any decision the FWS makes -- will soon have their hands full with an ESA lawsuit of truly historic (and global) proportions.