Subscribe!

 Full Posts

Bloglines Subscribe in Bloglines
Newsgator Subscribe in NewsGator Online
MyYahoo
Google Add to Google
netvibes Add to Netvibes

Copyleft

ESAblawg is an educational effort by Keith W. Rizzardi. Correspondence with this site does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Photos or links may be copyrighted (but used with permission, or as fair use). ESA blawg is published with a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons License

florida gators... never threatened!

If you ain't a Gator, you should be! Alligators (and endangered crocs) are important indicator species atop their food chains, with sensitivity to pollution and pesticides akin to humans. See ESA blawg. Gator blood could be our pharmaceutical future, too. See ESA musing.

gatorlogo2.gif

Follow the truth.

"This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson to William Roscoe, December 27, 1820.

uvaswords.jpg

Thanks, Kevin.

KEVIN S. PETTITT helped found this blawg. A D.C.-based IT consultant specializing in Lotus Notes & Domino, he also maintains Lotus Guru blog.

Contributors

PETE DAVID (Albuquerque, NM). Pete is a Certified Wildlife Biologist with 25 years experience with land stewardship and natural resources programs. He previously worked with the South Florida Water Management District, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Forest Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). His project experience includes reintroducing the federally endangered red-cockaded woodpecker to South Florida, and the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Act Collaborative Program in New Mexico. Today, Pete continues to work on endangered species issues as a Senior Project Manager for SWCA Environmental Consultants in Albuquerque.

YELIZAVETA BATRES (West Palm Beach, FL). Liz is currently clerking at the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal, after graduating from the University of Florida Levin College of Law, where she was a senior research editor of the Law Review. Liz also interned at the U.S. Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

« FWS reopens comment period and proposes additional critical habitat for salt creek tiger beetle and California red-legged frog | Main| ESA in the news: Obama reverses Bush, Wyoming and Alaska hope to reverse Obama, and other stories of fishermen, falcons, turtles, salmon and butterflies »

Salazar and Locke Announce Repeal of Bush Administration Rules Changing Consultations under the Endangered Species Act

Category  
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 

In a joint press release issued today, the Departments of Interior and Commerce announced a decision by Secretary Salazar and Secretary Locke to "Restore Scientific Consultations under the Endangered Species Act to Protect Species and their Habitats."  The agencies explained that they were revoking an eleventh-hour Bush administration rule that changed the Endangered Species Act (ESA) consultation process.  Their decision requires federal agencies to once again consult with federal wildlife experts at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – the two agencies that administer the ESA – before taking any action that may affect threatened or endangered species.

KEITHINKING: The decision represents a complete repudiation of the Bush Administration's efforts to alter the ESA consultation process, wholly repealing the rule, and exercising the authority granted by Congress, in the 2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act.  However, as explained in earlier ESA blawg postings (see especially Aug 16, 2008 and Nov. 22, 2008 and Dec. 11, 2008), some modification of the Section 7 process may -- eventually -- be appropriate, and the joint press release also said that "the two departments will conduct a joint review of the 1986 consultation regulations to determine if any improvements should be proposed."