Subscribe!

 Full Posts

Bloglines Subscribe in Bloglines
Newsgator Subscribe in NewsGator Online
MyYahoo
Google Add to Google
netvibes Add to Netvibes

Copyleft

ESAblawg is an educational effort by Keith W. Rizzardi. Correspondence with this site does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Photos or links may be copyrighted (but used with permission, or as fair use). ESA blawg is published with a Creative Commons License.

Creative Commons License

florida gators... never threatened!

If you ain't a Gator, you should be! Alligators (and endangered crocs) are important indicator species atop their food chains, with sensitivity to pollution and pesticides akin to humans. See ESA blawg. Gator blood could be our pharmaceutical future, too. See ESA musing.

gatorlogo2.gif

Follow the truth.

"This institution will be based on the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson to William Roscoe, December 27, 1820.

uvaswords.jpg

Thanks, Kevin.

KEVIN S. PETTITT helped found this blawg. A D.C.-based IT consultant specializing in Lotus Notes & Domino, he also maintains Lotus Guru blog.

« Noting human-induced threats, NOAA proposes 4(d) rule to protect threatened green sturgeon population from take | Main| ESA in the news: turtles, smelt, lynx, wolves, salmonids and... walrus? »

Speculation on Species and Ms. Sotomayor

Category  
Bookmark : del.icio.us  Technorati  Digg This  Add To Furl  Add To YahooMyWeb  Add To Reddit  Add To NewsVine 

A potential Supreme Court Justice has been nominated, so let the wild speculation begin.  How might Sonia Sotomayor change the highest court?  Will she declare the Endangered Species Act unconstitutional?  Indeed, for all the talk about “legal philosophy,” David Brooks and Gail Collins opine that the whole debate really is about policy, including whether a new justice will let the federal government keep protecting endangered species.  See New York Times blog.  No one really knows, but still the ink flows.  

Grist says Ms. Sotomayor has a small but solid record on environmental rulings, further quoting EarthJustice President Tripp Van Noppen to say that “This is the best Supreme Court nomination in many years.”   Skinny Moose says there’s not a lot of information out there, but based on the few morsels that do exist, Legal Planet thinks that “environmental issues are unlikely to loom large in the confirmation battle” because in a Second Circuit environmental case, Ms. Sotomayor said EPA could consider whether benefits were grossly disproportional to costs (a ruling deemed an environmentalist defeat.)

KEITHINKING: I’ll join the speculators, because, as even Ms. Sotomayor recognized, in her much criticized legal education presentation, courts are engaged in the "percolation" of policy.  IMO, Ms. Sotomayor would be unlikely to find the ESA unconstitutional.  In U.S. v. Giordano, Ms. Sotomayor rejected a commerce clause based effort to limit Congress’s regulatory power, holding (in a criminal case) that a national telephone network was an instrumentality of interstate commerce, even though a particular fact-pattern occurred only in an intrastate context.  So even if Pacific Legal Foundation reaches the Supreme Court with their constitutional challenge of the ESA and argument that the delta smelt is a purely intrastate species, Ms. Sotomayor is probably a vote against them.  (Nod to Sive, Paget and Reisel LLC)

SotomayorWhiteHouse.jpg
Photo of President Obama, Ms. Sotomayor, and Vice Pres. Biden by Pete Souza (5/26/09) available from The White House.